Dhurandhar 2 controversy: Danish Pandor questions ‘propaganda’ claims around Ranveer Singh film, says “Where is the politics?”

Dhurandhar 2 controversy: Danish Pandor questions ‘propaganda’ claims around Ranveer Singh film, says “Where is the politics?”

The debate surrounding Dhurandhar: The Revenge has intensified in recent days, with actor Danish Pandor stepping in to question accusations that the film is driven by political messaging or propaganda.

The Ranveer Singh-starrer, directed by Aditya Dhar, has emerged as one of the biggest box office successes of 2026, but its reception has been sharply divided, triggering a broader conversation on politics in cinema.

Danish Pandor responds to ‘propaganda’ criticism

In a recent interview, Danish Pandor who plays Uzair Baloch in the franchise addressed the growing criticism head-on.

Reacting to claims that the film pushes a political agenda, the actor questioned the basis of such interpretations, asking: “Where is politics involved in it?” 

Pandor maintained that the film should be seen primarily as storytelling rather than ideology-driven content. He suggested that audience interpretations may vary, but insisted that the intention behind the narrative was not political.

He also spoke about his role in the film, noting that even controversial or violent scenes were performed with an emphasis on emotional grounding and narrative justification.

Film faces mixed reactions despite massive success

The controversy comes at a time when Dhurandhar 2 is enjoying unprecedented commercial success. The film has crossed major box office milestones within days of release, cementing its position as a blockbuster.

However, alongside its commercial dominance, the film has attracted criticism from certain quarters. Some viewers and commentators have labelled it “propaganda,” pointing to its themes, portrayal of characters, and perceived political undertones.

The debate has extended beyond audiences to public figures and political voices, amplifying the conversation across social media and news platforms.

Political and social reactions add to the debate

The film’s narrative has drawn sharp reactions from some political commentators and activists. In one instance, criticism escalated to calls for banning films like Dhurandhar, with allegations that such content promotes biased or divisive narratives.

At the same time, the film has found strong defenders within the industry. Actor Anupam Kher dismissed critics labelling the film as propaganda, arguing that audiences are capable of forming their own opinions and that such films should be appreciated rather than politicised.

This divergence of views highlights a broader divide in how contemporary Indian cinema is interpreted—particularly when it intersects with real-world themes.

Other controversies surrounding the film

The “propaganda” debate is not the only issue surrounding Dhurandhar 2. The film has been at the centre of multiple controversies, including:

  • Allegations of plagiarism by a filmmaker claiming similarities with a previously registered script
  • Backlash over certain scenes and representations, including religious sensitivities
  • Early negative publicity affecting initial theatre occupancy before the film gained momentum

Despite these challenges, the film has continued to perform strongly, indicating that controversies have had limited impact on its commercial trajectory.

Industry trend: cinema and political interpretation

The reaction to Dhurandhar 2 reflects a larger trend where big-budget films are increasingly scrutinised for political undertones.

Critics argue that some films incorporate nationalistic or ideological narratives, while supporters contend that such interpretations are subjective and often exaggerated.

In this context, Danish Pandor’s comments align with a section of the industry that views cinema primarily as storytelling, rather than a vehicle for political messaging.

The bottom line

The debate over Dhurandhar 2 underscores the complex relationship between cinema, politics, and audience perception.

While critics continue to question its narrative intent, actors like Danish Pandor insist that the film is being misinterpreted. His response questioning “where the politics is” captures the central tension surrounding the film’s reception.

As the movie continues its strong box office run, the controversy highlights an evolving reality in Indian cinema: blockbuster success no longer shields films from intense ideological scrutiny it often amplifies it.

Add outlooknews.in as preferred source on google – click here

Also read – Oracle layoffs 2026: Tech giant begins job cuts, internal email reveals reasons behind restructuring

About The Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *