On June 19, 2025, Gujarat Police arrested Kirti Patel, a social media influencer with over 1.3 million Instagram followers, in Ahmedabad after a 10-month manhunt. Patel, also known as Kirti Adalja, was accused of orchestrating a high-profile honeytrapping and extortion scheme targeting a Surat-based real estate builder, Vaju Katrodiya. The case, which involved a ransom demand of ₹2 crore, has drawn significant attention due to Patel’s large online following and her alleged criminal activities, including honeytrapping, blackmail, and defamation through social media. This article delves into the details of the case, Patel’s background, the modus operandi of the honeytrap, the police investigation, and the broader implications of such incidents involving social media influencers.
The Arrest and Charges
Kirti Patel was apprehended in the Sarkhej area of Ahmedabad on Wednesday, June 18, 2025, following a meticulous operation by the Surat Police, assisted by cyber experts and local authorities. The arrest came after an FIR was filed on June 2, 2024, accusing Patel and six accomplices of honeytrapping Katrodiya and attempting to extort ₹2 crore. Four of the other accused had already been arrested, while Patel had evaded capture for over 10 months by frequently changing locations, SIM cards, and IP addresses to mask her digital footprint.
According to Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Zone-1, Surat, Alok Kumar, a court in Surat issued a warrant against Patel following the FIR. The police tracked her movements with the help of their technical team, eventually locating her in Ahmedabad. She was produced before a court for remand, and the investigation remains ongoing to determine if similar tactics were used against other victims. Patel faces charges of honeytrapping, extortion, and land grabbing, with additional complaints linked to her name across Gujarat.
The Honeytrapping Scheme
Honeytrapping is a deceptive practice where an individual, often using charm or romantic pretense, lures a victim into a compromising situation to blackmail or extort them. In this case, Patel and her associates allegedly targeted Vaju Katrodiya, a prominent builder in Surat. The scheme began when Zakir Pathan, one of the accomplices, contacted Katrodiya, offering to mediate a dispute. Pathan invited Katrodiya to a farmhouse where another accomplice, Janvi, was present. There, Katrodiya was allegedly coerced into consuming alcohol, and compromising photos were taken with Janvi. These photos were later used to blackmail Katrodiya, with the group demanding ₹2 crore to prevent their release.
The group also reportedly used social media to defame Katrodiya, leveraging Patel’s large online following to pressure him into complying with their demands. When Katrodiya refused to pay, the accused attempted to malign his reputation further, a tactic that aligns with Patel’s history of posting abusive content and threats online. This incident highlights the dangerous intersection of social media influence and criminal activity, where public personas can be weaponized to intimidate or extort.
Kirti Patel’s Background
Kirti Patel, also known as Kirti Adalja, is a Gujarati digital content creator with over 1.3 million followers on Instagram (@kirti_patel_official5143). Known for her videos featuring bike riding and public interactions, Patel cultivated a vibrant online persona that resonated with a large audience. However, her public image masked a troubling criminal history. Described as a “history-sheeter” by the police, Patel has been named in at least ten FIRs across Gujarat, with charges ranging from extortion and land grabbing to attempted murder.
In 2020, Patel was linked to an attempted murder case involving Raghu Bharwad, alias Boliyo, who accused her of attacking him following a dispute and publicly insulting him on TikTok. Her continued activity on social media, even while evading arrest, included attending public events and posting regular updates, giving no indication of her fugitive status. This duality—maintaining a glamorous influencer persona while allegedly engaging in criminal activities—has shocked her followers and sparked discussions about the authenticity of social media personalities.
Police Investigation and Challenges
The Surat Police faced significant challenges in apprehending Patel due to her evasive tactics. She frequently changed her location across Gujarat, used multiple SIM cards, and masked her digital footprint with different IP addresses. The investigation required the expertise of cyber specialists and coordination with Ahmedabad authorities to track her to Sarkhej. DCP Alok Kumar emphasized the role of the technical team in overcoming these obstacles, highlighting the increasing importance of cyber forensics in modern policing.
The case also underscores the complexities of pursuing high-profile individuals who leverage their public image to evade accountability. Patel’s ability to remain active on Instagram while on the run suggests a deliberate strategy to maintain her influence and possibly intimidate complainants. The police are now investigating whether her network extends to other victims or similar honeytrapping rackets, indicating that this arrest may be the tip of a larger criminal operation.
Social Media and Crime: A Dangerous Nexus
The Kirti Patel case highlights the growing intersection of social media and criminal activity. Influencers with large followings wield significant power to shape narratives and influence public perception. In this instance, Patel allegedly used her platform to defame and pressure her victim, amplifying the impact of the extortion attempt. This tactic is particularly concerning in the digital age, where social media can be used to manipulate, intimidate, or silence individuals with minimal effort.
The phenomenon of influencers engaging in or being linked to criminal activities is not new, but Patel’s case stands out due to the scale of her following and the audacity of her actions while evading arrest. Her ability to maintain a public persona, attend events, and post content without arousing suspicion raises questions about the accountability of influencers and the platforms that host them. Social media companies may face increased scrutiny to monitor and regulate content that could be linked to criminal behavior, especially when it involves public figures with substantial influence.
Broader Implications
The arrest of Kirti Patel has sparked widespread debate about the authenticity and responsibility of social media influencers. With over 1.3 million followers, Patel’s case illustrates how online fame can be a double-edged sword, providing a platform for influence while potentially masking illicit activities. This incident may prompt brands and followers to reassess their trust in influencers, particularly those with questionable backgrounds.
From a legal perspective, the case underscores the need for robust mechanisms to address cyber-enabled crimes such as honeytrapping and extortion. The use of compromising photos, social media defamation, and digital evasion tactics highlights the evolving nature of criminal schemes in the digital era. Law enforcement agencies may need to invest further in cyber forensics and inter-agency collaboration to tackle such cases effectively.
Moreover, the case raises ethical questions about the role of social media platforms in moderating content. While Patel’s videos appeared innocuous, her alleged use of Instagram to intimidate and defame suggests a need for stricter oversight of influencer activities. Platforms may face pressure to implement measures to detect and flag content linked to criminal behavior, balancing user privacy with public safety.
Public and Media Reaction
The arrest has generated significant buzz on social media and in news outlets, with posts on X reflecting a mix of shock and intrigue. For instance, a post by @CNNnews18 noted Patel’s 1.3 million followers and her alleged role in honeytrapping, while @livemint emphasized the 10-month manhunt and the ₹2 crore ransom demand. Other posts, such as those from @publictvnews and @dna, highlighted the sensational nature of the case, with headlines focusing on Patel’s influencer status and the dramatic circumstances of her arrest. These reactions underscore the public’s fascination with the juxtaposition of Patel’s glamorous online persona and her alleged criminal activities.
Mainstream media coverage has been equally extensive, with outlets like NDTV, Hindustan Times, and India Today providing detailed accounts of the case. Reports have focused on Patel’s evasion tactics, her criminal history, and the mechanics of the honeytrap scheme. The coverage also reflects broader concerns about the misuse of social media influence, with some outlets questioning the credibility of influencers in light of such incidents.
You can also read: https://outlooknews.in/operation-sindhu-110-indian-students-safely-evacuated-from-war-torn-iran-land-in-delhi/
Last Updated on: Thursday, June 19, 2025 7:22 pm by Ventrapati Mahitha | Published by: Ventrapati Mahitha on Thursday, June 19, 2025 7:22 pm | News Categories: News, Trending
About The Author
